The Comment I Have Been Waiting For…

Just received this awesome comment on YouTube on the Chony Milecki interview video we just released. This guy gets it and as he mentions in text below he is a Baal Teshuva so I am including this audio highlight (below) about how amazing Baal Teshuvas  are.


I’ve been following Rabbi Friedman’s videos on this subject for a few months… since moving to Brooklyn and encountering very learned yeshivish guys who are really stuck on this concept of Hashem being perfect, therefore he doesn’t need us or our mitzvahs. So why do we do them? Because He told us to, and our logic is not His logic, so we can’t possibly understand and shouldn’t try. As a BT who became more observant through Chabad, it was a bit of a shock for me to discover that highly learned yidden had such an essential conflict with the idea of our being in a true relationship with Hashem. Because, if Hashem doesn’t need and doesn’t care, it’s not a relationship! So what are you doing all this for? This subject cuts through whatever learning a person has achieved, and really goes to the root of a one’s faith. Over several videos (one of Manis and another Rav addressing the questions of Crown Heights chabadnik bochers, another of yeshivish bochers in Eretz Yisrael, etc.), I received a glimpse of a way to address this line of reasoning, but this was by far the best, most complete exposition of his thoughts to date. Thank you to Rabbi Friedman and the 11213 crew for coming back to this issue again and again.


Audio Highlight:

Mobile user/Download link: Baal Teshuvas Are Amazing
(To Download: Right click link and select “Save Link As”)



Chony Milecki Interview: Why have you focused so much on one topic?

Audio version:

Mobile user/Download link: Why have you focused so much on one topic?
(To Download: Right click link and select “Save Link As”)



Boro Park: Warning- Don’t Allow Religion To Harm You

Audio version:

Mobile user/Download link: Boro Park: Warning- Don’t Allow Religion To Harm You
(To Download: Right click link and select “Save Link As”)



Episode 1: The Philosophy of Chabad- The Ultimate Question

In honor of Beis Nissan

Audio version:


Mobile user/Download link: Episode 1: The Philosophy of Chabad- The Ultimate Question
(To Download: Right click link and select “Save Link As”)

Edited Transcription:

  • Series:
    The Philosophy of Chabad
    Episode 1:
    The Ultimate Question
    Question for Discussion:
    Does G-d Need Your Mitzvos?
    We are dealing here with the ultimate fundamental question. This is not something we can dismiss easily
    or be half-hearted about. This is it.
    For thousands of years we have mesiras nefesh to do the mitzvos and not to do aveiros. To then be told
    that G-d himself doesn’t necessarily need the mitzvah doesn’t sound right at all. You can’t be inspired if
    He is not, you can’t serve Him if He doesn’t even really want you to! Even to say G-d that wants you to
    serve Him and He wants the mitzvah on a certain level, but really deep down G-d doesn’t need it, etc.,
    that’s like saying, “Don’t take it seriously.”
    Unless, of course, you want to get Gan Eden; you want to be a Tzadik because you want a reward. In
    that case, as badly as you want the reward, that’s how seriously you are going to take the mitzvos. But
    then what does the Mishna (Avot 1:3) mean to not do a mitzvah for the reward? If I am not doing the
    mitzvah for the reward and G-d doesn’t necessarily need it, what am I doing? It’s either for me or for Him
    —it can’t be for nobody!
    Now, if you look at the Mishna, before you even get to Chassidus, the mishna puts the message into a
    context. What is the context? Don’t be like a servant who serves his master for the sake of the reward,
    etc. Why do you have the mashal of a servant and a master; why don’t you simply say don’t do the
    mitzvos for the reward?
    The context is important because it explains the sense and the reasoning behind the message: Why
    should we not do mitzvos for the reward? If not for the reward, then for what? The mashal is teaching us
    that a servant serves his master without the thought of a reward because he is serving his master. In
    other words, by knowing that the master is getting what he needs, I don’t need to get something I need
    because his pleasure is all the reward I need. But if there is no Rav, there is no master, and I am not
    doing anything for him, then why I should do a mitzvah without thought of a reward?
    So, the Mishna is telling you don’t need more reward than knowing that what you’re doing for the Eibishter
    is what He needs. To then come along and say, “But He doesn’t need…,” well then what are we left with?
    People are justifiably uncomfortable with the word “need” if you apply it to the Eibishter because that
    sounds like a contradiction. The reason He is G-d is because He doesn’t need anything, so if He needs
    how is He G-d?
    It’s a good question, but you can’t avoid the logic of saying that there is something in it for G-d. “Brieshis
    bara elokim es hashamayim ves haretz…” Nu? He didn’t need it? We certainly didn’t need it—we weren’t
    even created yet.
    Now, you can say that G-d doesn’t need it for Himself; He only created the world because we would
    eventually benefit, and He wants to do what’s best for us. Some use a mashal that G-d is like a father
    who is trying to do what’s best for his kid: A father doesn’t need to do what’s best for his kid, but he wants
    to; it’s just for his kid. But still, there is obviously an interest, an investment that the father is making
    because of who he is. No one else but a father is that interested in his kid. When it comes to G-d, is
    creating the world for our benefit not an investment because of who He is? And how badly does He want
    to do what’s best for us? Partially, whole heartedly, infinitely? So, you can’t get away from it.